๐๐ค๐ค ๐๐ช๐๐, ๐๐ค๐ค ๐๐ค๐ค๐ฃ? ๐ผ๐ง๐ ๐๐๐จ ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐จ๐ฉ๐ง๐๐ฉ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐ค ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฃ?
Lately, I’ve seen more and more Product Managers diving headfirst into Vibe coding, spending most of their time learning and using low-code or no-code tools, developing, and deploying their “production-ready” builds.
At the same time, some mid to large-sized companies are cutting engineering or design roles and expecting PMs (assuming with the help of AI-enabled tools) to do it all, going from requirements to release, solo.
This might work in a startup or simple products, but it rarely scales well in complex or mature products. At least not yet.
To my fellow PMs rushing to learn Vibe coding as their primary goal: Exploring tools can spark creativity and speed up prototyping, and all good with that!
Let’s only remember, as Product Managers, your core mission is to define the ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐, prioritise the ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฝ, and work closely with customers to build the right ๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ thing.
Tools and tech stacks are there to support that mission, not replace it. ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐๐ on what matters most and ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐๐ฒ the rest to the right people or automated processes.
To companies leaning on PMs to fill engineering or design gaps: I’m all for cost-effective solutions that improve ROI and increase accessibility.
Let’s only remember that cutting corners might get you to market faster, but poor code quality and unscalable builds will cost far more down the track.
๐๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ต ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ค๐ต๐ด ๐ด๐ต๐ช๐ญ๐ญ ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ด๐ฌ๐ช๐ญ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ง๐จ, ๐ณ๐ช๐จ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ด ๐ฉ๐๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ฃ๐, ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ข ๐ง๐ญ๐ฆ๐น๐ช๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ช๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ๐บ ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐๐จ๐จ, ๐ด๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐บ ๐๐ช๐ง๐๐ค๐ช๐จ ๐๐๐จ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ด๐ต๐ข๐บ ๐ง๐ฐ๐ค๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ท๐ช๐ด๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ข๐ค๐ต.
You can launch 100 features that flop, or one that truly hits the mark.
Focus matters. Don’t lose yours.

Comments
Post a Comment